Comparisons
How Oak compares.
Honest, side-by-side: where Oak wins (Cantonese, code-switching, Voice Memory) and where alternatives are stronger.
Capability
Oak
Alt A
Alt B
Alt C
Cantonese accuracy
Industry-leading
Limited
—
Limited
Cantonese ↔ English code-switching
✓
✕
✕
Partial
99+ languages
✓
✓
✓
✓
Persistent Speaker Recognition (Voice Memory)
✓
✕
✕
Per-meeting only
Custom summary templates
✓
Fixed
✓
Limited
Custom jargon library
✓
✓
✕
✓
Ask AI on transcript
✓
✓
✓
Beta
Timestamped action items
✓
Manual
✓
✓
Browser, no install
✓
✕
✓
✕
Free trial
7 days
Freemium
14 days
Demo only
Starting price (USD/mo)
$12.99
$10
$18
Custom
Why Oak
Three reasons multilingual teams switch.
01
Cantonese, done right
Industry-leading accuracy on Cantonese — including casual register, slang, and mixed-language phrasing.
02
Voice Memory
Tag a speaker once. Oak recognises them in every future meeting. No re-tagging, no manual correction.
03
Browser-first
No desktop app, no install. Works in any modern browser, on any device, anywhere your team is.